DEVELOPING A PROJECT MANAGEMENT MATURITY MODEL TO ENHANCE EXECUTION PERFORMANCE IN SOLAR EPC PROJECTS: A CASE STUDY OF PT TML ENERGY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v5i12.1528Keywords:
Project Management Maturity, Crawford Maturity Model, Solar EPC, Mixed-Methods, PMBOK, Project Execution DelayAbstract
PT TML Energy, an Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) company specializing in solar energy projects in Indonesia, experienced recurring project execution delays of 20–40% beyond planned schedules during 2021–2024. A review of project records indicated that these delays stem not from technical limitations but from systemic weaknesses in project management maturity. This study assesses the current level of project management maturity and develops a tailored Project Management Maturity Model to improve execution performance. A mixed-methods approach was applied: qualitative semi-structured interviews with four key informants explored why delays occur, while a quantitative questionnaire of twenty respondents measured maturity across seven PMBOK Knowledge Areas using Crawford’s (2014) Project Management Maturity Model. The qualitative analysis produced seven Knowledge-Area themes and identified five interconnected root causes of delay: absence of integrated pre-project planning, reactive and fragmented procurement, experience-dependent scheduling, informal communication, and absence of organizational learning. While the questionnaire placed the company at Level 4 (mean = 3.86), triangulation with interview evidence revealed a self-assessment inflation of approximately 1.3 levels, indicating an operational maturity at the upper boundary of Level 2. Five integrated business solutions were developed: an Integrated Project Management Plan template, a procurement lead-time integration framework, a parametric schedule database, a communication management plan template, and a lessons-learned database with a competency development framework. The findings demonstrate that single-method maturity assessments tend to overstate maturity, and that mixed-methods triangulation produces a more accurate and actionable maturity profile for emerging-market EPC contractors.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Iftikar Fadhlirohman Soeroyo, Gatot Yudoko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.










