The Selection of Weapon Systems in The A2/AD (Not Access/Area Denial) Strategy at Indonesia's Strategic Choke Points by Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method

Authors

  • Tri Yudha Ismanto The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Fathurrohman Umar The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Setyanggono Eko Lutvie The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Udayana Agung The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Prasetyo Hari The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Midhio I Wayan The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia
  • Yusgiantoro Purnomo The Republic of Indonesia Defense University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v3i6.615

Keywords:

Weapon Systems, Selection, Indonesia, A2/AD strategy, Choke Points, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Abstract

This article utilizes the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to decide how to choose an effective weapon system for the A2/AD (anti-access/area denial) strategy at the Sunda Strait, Indonesia's strategic choke point. The main discussion is limited to selecting the types of weapon systems considered effective in implementing A2/AD at Indonesia's strategic choke points. The next step is to decide which primary, secondary, and alternative criteria are the most important. Each of these will then be put together mathematically by measuring consistency using the Consistency Index (CI), the Consistency Ratio (CR), and the Consistency Hierarchy, which is the ranking as the result of the analysis. This method resulting in a weight for the navigation criteria of 66%, projection of 19%, and operability of 16%. Furthermore, in conclusion, the order of the best weapon systems is RBS15 MK4 with a weight of 66%, Brahmos II at 18%, and Neptune 360ST at 16%.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-25

How to Cite

Ismanto, T. Y., Umar, F. ., Lutvie, S. E. ., Agung, U. ., Hari, P. ., Wayan, M. I. ., & Purnomo, Y. . (2024). The Selection of Weapon Systems in The A2/AD (Not Access/Area Denial) Strategy at Indonesia’s Strategic Choke Points by Using The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method. Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management, 3(6), 1418 –. https://doi.org/10.59141/jrssem.v3i6.615

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Tri Yudha Ismanto, Fathurrohman Umar, Setyanggono Eko Lutvie, Udayana Agung, Prasetyo Hari, Midhio I Wayan, Yusgiantoro Purnomo

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.