JRSSEM 2023, Vol. 02, No. 6, 1022 1034
E-ISSN: 2807 - 6311, P-ISSN: 2807 - 6494
DOI : 10.36418/jrssem.v2i06.300 https://jrssem.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jrssem/index
THE ROLE OF BRAND ANTHROPOMORPHISM IN
SHAPING BRAND LOVE AND BRAND LOYALTY TO
EUROPEAN CAR CONSUMERS IN INDONESIA
Pramatatya Resindra Widya
1
Adi Mursalin
2
1
Shanti Bhuana Institute, Bengkayang, West Kalimantan, Indonesia
2
Faculty of Economics, Panca Bhakti University, Pontianak, Indonesia
*
e-mail: pramatatya@shantibhuana.ac.id, adimursalin@gmail.com
*Correspondence: pramatatya@shantibhuana.ac.id
Submitted
: 11
th
November 2022
Revised
: 25
th
December 2022
Accepted
: 25
th
January 2023
Abstract: This study will examine the influence of brand anthropomorphism and brand experience
on brand love and its impact on brand loyalty with perceived price fairness as the moderation
variable. The research uses a quantitative approach with a survey method. The sample in this study
amounted to 250 European car users spread across DKI Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Central Java, and
East Java. The analysis model in this study will be divided into 3 stages analysis. The first stage is
multiple regression analysis, the second stage is simple regression analysis. The third stage of the
moderation test with hierarchical moderated regression Brand anthropomorphism had a positive
effect on the formation of brand love. Brand experience also has a positive and significant effect
on brand love. Brand love has a positive effect on brand engagement. perceived price fairness does
not moderate the relationship between brand love and brand engagement. For further research, it
is suggested to add subjective norm variables to this research model.
Keywords: Brand Anthropomorphism; Consumers; European Car; Building Brand Love and Brand
Loyalty.
Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1023
INTRODUCTION
A brand is important for marketers. This
is because a brand is like an identity for the
product or service offered. In other words,
a brand is an identity that is known by
consumers to the wider community. To be
able to increase brand loyalty, companies
must have brand experience. Brand
experiences occur when consumers search,
shop, and consume products that
consumers are exposed to when they
search for information or visit stores. When
searching for goods, consumers are
exposed to various stimuli related to a
particular brand (Kim & Yu, 2020). In
addition, it is also influenced by the brand
trust. Brand trust is defined as the
willingness of consumers to trust a brand to
rely on a brand's ability to perform its
functions (Chaudhuri & Holbrook, 2008).
According to Payne et al. (2017), consumer
trust in brands is very important for
companies to be able to establish good
relationships with consumers and maintain
consumer trust. In order for consumers to
buy back products from the company, the
company must introduce its products well
in order to build brand trust in consumers.
Brand satisfaction (brand satisfaction) is
where the performance of a product is felt
according to the expectations of the buyer,
if the performance of a product or service
is in accordance with expectations, the
customer will be satisfied or vice versa. A
smart company aims to satisfy customers
by delivering more than they promise.
Customers who are satisfied with a product
can lead to loyalty (Kotler & Armstrong,
2014).
One of the things that can create
customer loyalty is brand engagement.
(Wallace et al., 2014) stated that brand
engagement is a sign of a customer's
emotional commitment to a brand. Things
that affect the creation of brand
engagement include the activity of
emotional relationships between a brand
and its consumers in digital media, such as
social media, websites, blogs, and other
digital sites. All activity on social media has
the potential to have an influence in
enhancing those emotional connections.
The term 'engagement' or engagement can
be defined as an interest in the
representation of an object. Engagement
can also be interpreted as the result of
repeated interactions that strengthen the
emotional and psychological bond
between consumers and brands. In simple
terms, engagement is the action or
participation of consumers in the digital or
online world. Measuring the level of
consumer engagement in a brand on social
media can be seen based on the results of
account analysis in general or at the level of
each content uploaded.
One of the factors that shape brand
engagement is brand love. Brand love
originated from research conducted in the
field of consumer delight and relationships
that explored the duo of consumers and
brands. The origin of love lies in the
psychology in which (Sternberg, 2018)
discusses the concept of love with the help
of Intimacy, Passion and Commitment.
Furthermore, (Carroll & Ahuvia, 2006)
introduced the concept of brand love
taking hedonic products as a stimulus.
Brand love is irreplaceable and much more
intense than the concept of "likes".
1024 | The Role of Brand Anthropomorphism In Shaping Brand Love and Brand Loyalty To
European Car Consumers In Indonesia
Therefore, it has emerged as a significant
construction that affects several other
constructions such as brand loyalty, brand
sacredness, and brand advocacy (Drennan
et al., 2015), (Wang et al., 2019), (Palusuk et
al., 2019), Joshi and Garg, 2020). Some
authors have outlined the antecedents and
results of brand love. However,
construction has such a strong impact on
consumer psychology that the literature on
branding should continue to explore its
new horizons. Love takes different forms
that can generate jealousy (Sarkar et al.,
2019); can lead to a willingness to pay (Siew
et al., 2018) and, can turn consumers into
brand cultists. A construction with such
dynamic properties can never end
Researched. (Drennan et al., 2015) discuss a
framework that states the role of brand
trust and brand satisfaction in brand love in
the context of wine. The authors discuss
that future researchers may explore the role
of additional antecedents such as a brand
image in determining brand love. The effect
of brand love on active engagement and
loyalty intentions was discussed by (Sarkar
& Sreejesh, 2014) and (Sarkar et al., 2019)
respectively in their study.
Today marketers realize that a brand is
not just a brand that becomes an identity.
However, the brand has a soul that reflects
the cross-section of the brand and must be
conveyed to the public. Likewise from the
customer side. In customers who already
have experience with the brand, it may be
that they will feel that they fit the brand and
instead make the brand a reflection of
themselves. But sometimes the opposite
happens. A person wears a brand because
of the image that the brand evokes. This
shows that today the brand or brand
already has a soul. A brand is associated
with the depiction of a human being who
has senses and a soul like a human being.
So it often reflects a match when used by
customers. The belief that consumers tend
to perceive branded products as if human
objects are becoming popular among
marketing scholars and practitioners.
Anthropomorphization tendencies in
several ways, such as product design, brand
naming, and animation. In the automotive
industry, for example, product designers
often give cars an outward look that makes
consumers think of these things as actual
human beings. Empirical research also
supports this practice. showing that
consumers tend to associate car headlights
and grille with two human eyes and mouth
(Windhager et al., 2008); (Landwehr et al.,
2011). Marketers also give names to
products that explicitly relate to humans
(e.g., Mr. Clean) in an effort to support
anthropomorphization. In advertising,
animation and computer graphics
technology are used by communication
agencies to develop campaigns promoting
branded products as animated entities
(e.g., M&M ads, nutrisari, etc). In academic
research, the tendency of consumers to
anthropomorphization of branded
products has recently attracted the
attention of scholars. Previous studies have
examined the psychological processes that
are activated when consumers are faced
with products with a human-like
appearance (Aggarwal & McGill, 2007), and
their consequences on product evaluation
(Landwehr et al., 2011) and purchasing
behavior (Chandler & Schwarz, 2010);
(Aggarwal & McGill, 2012). In other streams
of research, research has investigated how
Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1025
consumers build relationships with brands
similar to interpersonal brands (Fournier,
1998); (Fournier & Alvarez, 2012), whether
and to what extent consumers view brands
as 'intelligent agents' (Rijsdijk et al., 2007),
or 'deliberate agents' (Kervyn et al,2012), as
well as how consumers experience
emotions towards brands that are usually
felt by humans, such as love (Batra et al.,
2012), passion and forgiveness (MacInnis,
2012). In academic research, the tendency
of consumers to anthropomorphization of
branded products has recently attracted
the attention of scholars. Previous studies
have examined the psychological processes
that are activated when consumers are
faced with products with a human-like
appearance (Aggarwal & McGill, 2007), and
their consequences on product evaluation
(Landwehr et al., 2011) and purchasing
behavior (Chandler & Schwarz, 2010)
(Aggarwal & McGill, 2012). In other streams
of research, research has investigated how
consumers build relationships with brands
similar to interpersonal brands (Fournier,
1998); (Fournier & Alvarez, 2012), whether
and to what extent consumers view brands
as 'intelligent agents' (Rijsdijk et al., 2007),
or 'deliberate agents' (Kervyn et al,2012), as
well as how consumers experience
emotions towards brands that are usually
felt by humans, such as love (Batra et al.,
2012), passion and forgiveness (MacInnis,
2012). In conclusion, brand
anthropomorphism, that is, the extent to
which branded products are considered
human (Epley et al, 2007; (Aggarwal &
McGill, 2012), are gaining a superior
position in branding research. However,
despite its growing relevance in research
and practice, little is known about the
conceptual domain of this relatively recent
construction and its measurements.
Previous studies (e.g., (Aggarwal & McGill,
2007); Kim and McGill, 2011) have
examined this concept in an experimental
setting, manipulating rather than
measuring the degree of brand
anthropomorphism, and some of the
available scales are only used for
manipulation examination without being
empirically validated. This research fills this
important gap by developing a scale of
measurement of brand anthropomorphism,
which can be useful for researchers and
practitioners to ask how branded products
can be anthropomorphized, and whether
this phenomenon has an impact on
consumers' perception and evaluation of
these products. Anthropomorphism refers
to an individual's tendency to see inanimate
objects as human-like entities (Guthrie,
1995). Epley et al (2007) describes this
phenomenon as a process of inference that
connects external characteristics,
motivations, behaviors, and basic states
typical of humans with non-human objects
and agents. Psychological research has
extensively shown how people tend to
anthropomorphize objects such as
personal computers (Waytzdkk,2010) and
cars (Windhager et al., 2008), as well as
non-human agents such as supernatural
entities (Epley et al,2008a) and pets
(Chartrand et al., 2008). Such a trend seems
so widespread that it has recently caught
the attention of marketing experts (e.g.,
Kim and McGill, 2011; (Aggarwal & McGill,
2012), who investigated
anthropomorphism with respect to
branded products. The concept of brand
anthropomorphism here is defined as the
1026 | The Role of Brand Anthropomorphism In Shaping Brand Love and Brand Loyalty To
European Car Consumers In Indonesia
extent to which a branded product is
considered an actual human being. In
particular, the anthropomorphic perception
of branded products may occur through
two different, but not mutually exclusive
processes. First, it may occur through the
perceived similarity between the external
appearance of the product and some
human physical attributes (for example, a
product package that resembles the human
body; (Aggarwal & McGill, 2007); Epley et
al.,2007; (Puzakova et al., 2009). In addition,
the anthropomorphic perception of
branded products may occur through the
perceived fit between the product and
some aspects of the consumer's self-
concept (Fournier, 1998); (J. Aaker et al.,
2004). The construct of self-concept refers
to how the consumer perceives themselves
and consists of different, albeit related,
aspects: the 'actual' self-concept (that is,
whom he or she thinks), the 'ideal' self-
concept (that is, whom one wants to be),
the 'social' self-concept (that is, whom
others believe others think of themselves),
or the 'social ideal' self-concept (that is,
whom others want to think of themselves).
(Sirgy, 1982); (J. L. Aaker, 1999). Thus, an
anthropomorphic perception of a branded
product may occur to what extent
consumers perceive the product according
to how they view themselves in actual,
ideal, or social terms (for example, a
product whose image is consistent with the
actual or ideal personality traits of the
product). This reason implies that brand
anthropomorphism is a multidimensional
construction. However, hypothesizing the
specific theoretical dimensions of this
construct is not an easy task, given its
complexity and relative novelty in the
domain of marketing. One can identify at
least two main dimensions underlying
brand anthropomorphism: one dimension
about the outward appearance of a
branded product, and another dimension
based on the idea of self-brand fit, that is,
the extent to which the product reflects
consumers' perception of themselves.
Recent research provides support for the
existence of such dimensional structures.
As for the first dimension, previous studies
have provided evidence of the presence of
external components of construction brand
anthropomorphism, according to which
products are considered anthropomorphic
entities to what extent they have a human-
like morphology. In particular, (Aggarwal &
McGill, 2007) have shown that products are
more likely to be anthropomorphic when
they are endowed with physical
characteristics (such as the depiction of
people 'smiling' in the design of the front
grille of a particular brand of car) capable of
activating human schemes during
perception. (Landwehr et al., 2011) has
shown that consumers exposed to
products with human-like physical
characteristics perceive such objects using
the same inferences they use in
interpersonal perception. For example, the
authors observed that the special
configuration of the lower 'mouth' button
on the phone (i.e., reverse versus lowered)
led respondents to infer 'friendliness' in
that product, in the same way a smile
directed people to use this. emotional
expression to infer happiness in a smiling
person (Ekman, 1993). As for the second
dimension of brand anthropomorphism,
which concerns self-brand alignment,
academic research has long shown that
Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1027
consumers evaluate and select products
based on the extent to which these
products are considered to fit their self-
concept (Sirgy, 1982). Specifically,
consumers tend to choose branded
products that help them express their
actual, ideal, or social self-view (Sirgy,
1982); (J. L. Aaker, 1999). The effect of self-
alignment on product choice becomes the
basis of consumers' tendency to see a part
of themselves in their favorite brands and
products (Belk, 1988); (Escalas & Bettman,
2005); Lam et al, 2013), and to establish
relationships with these objects similar to
those normally constructed with others
(Fournier, 1998); (J. Aaker et al., 2004). All
this is a psychological process that occurs
in the minds of consumers - that is, the
assessment of the suitability of the brand
itself, the successive identification with
certain branded products, and the
subsequent development of an
'interpersonal' relationship with them
require anthropomorphized inanimate
objects. In such cases,
anthropomorphization does not have to be
based on the external appearance of the
branded product, but also on the perceived
similarity between internal qualities (such
as motivation, emotions, and mental states)
that are considered to be derived from
themselves and those that they consider
being derived from the product (Fournier &
Alvarez, 2012). Another study (Fitzsimons et
al., 2008); (Aggarwal & McGill, 2012) further
supports the idea that consumers can
anthropomorphize branded products
based on the suitability of their own brand,
beyond external appearance, by finding
that individuals prioritized a self-
appropriate brand interaction with this
brand in a similar way to that usually
observed among humans.
According to (Matzler et al., 2007) Price
Fairness is a consumer perception where
the difference between the price received is
feasible compared to others, can be
considered or the price is acceptable. If the
consumer's perceived price is lower, then
the sacrifices given will also be lower
(Zeithaml, 1998). Consumers of service
goods actually value high prices because
these prices describe the prestige/image of
quality, or the acquisition of certain special
benefits (Yazid et al., 2020). Price fairness
involves a comparison of the price of the
procedure with a standard in question,
reference, or norm (Martín‐Consuegra et
al., 2007). (Martín‐Consuegra et al., 2007)
also define price fairness as an assessment
of an outcome and a process for achieving
a reasonable and acceptable outcome. The
reasonableness of the price can be
measured by several attributes as follows:
1. The customer feels that they are
paying a reasonable price on every
purchase transaction.
2. Reference to the level of
reasonableness of the price, where
the customer feels it is reasonable if a
product or service of the same type
from different companies is set at a
different price.
3. The price fairness policy determined
by the company is reasonable and
acceptable to customers.
4. The reasonableness of the price set
is an ethic, where the customer is
always informed of the price
changes that will be made by the
company before the new price is
set.
1028 | The Role of Brand Anthropomorphism In Shaping Brand Love and Brand Loyalty To
European Car Consumers In Indonesia
This research will examine the
influence of brand anthropomorphism and
brand experience on brand love and its
impact on brand loyalty with perceived
price fairness as a moderation variable
.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The method used in this study is
quantitative using a survey method with
non-probability pasting techniques. The
selection of this technique is used because
it is not known exactly the actual number of
the study population (Cooper, 2011).
Respondents and samples from this study
used several criteria so as to use
purposive
sampling
techniques (Malhotra, 2012). The
population in the study was European car
customers such as BMW, Mercedes, and so
on. The sample in this study amounted to
250 European car users spread across DKI
Jakarta, DI Yogyakarta, Central Java, East
Java, data collection methods are one
aspect that plays a role in the smoothness
and success of a study. In this study, the
data collection method was obtained
directly from respondents through the
dissemination of questionnaires both via
the internet and directly using the
questionnaire by making a systematic list of
questions directly on the selected
respondents into a research sample
compiled using a Likert scale. Each question
has 5 answers, ranging from strongly agree,
agree, neutral, disagree, and strongly
disagree. In this study, data collection was
carried out using a survey method
connected to google Forms and spread by
utilizing social media access to Facebook,
Whatsapp, and email. The secondary data
is obtained from data sourced to writings
such as books, magazines, journals, the
internet, and other data related to this
research. The variables used as operational
definitions in this study are t brand
anthropomorphism, brand experiences,
and brand love. Meanwhile, the perceived
price fairness variable is the variable
moderation. The dependent variable in this
study is brand loyalty. The conceptual
framework in this study can be seen in the
following figure:
Picture 1. Theoritical Framework
Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1029
The analysis model in this study will be
divided into 3 stages analysis. The first
stage is to analyze the influence of brand
anthropomorphism and brand experience
on brand love with multiple regression
analysis. The second stage is to analyze the
influence of brand love on brand loyalty
with a simple regression analysis tool. The
third stage is the analysis of perceived price
fairness in moderating the relationship
between brand love and brand loyalty with
hierarchical moderated regression
(Andersson, 1986).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Testing in this study was carried out in
4 stages. First, the KMO-MSA test to test
the adequacy of data variance, the
instrument validity test with factor loading,
and the Reliability test by looking at
Cronbach's alpha value. The results of the
data quality test can be seen in table 1.
Table 1.
Data Quality Test Results
Source : Primary Data
Variable
KMO-MSA
Grain
Loading factor
( > 0,4)
Cronbach’s Alpha
( > 0,5)
Brand
anthropomor
phism
.853
Sample
adequacy
Fulfilled
(KMO-MSA>0,5)
BA1
BA2
BA3
BA4
.780
.843
.678
.649
0,745
Brand
Experience
BE1
BE 2
BE 3
BE 4
BE 5
.871
.743
.765
.830
.720
0,649
Brand Love
BL 1
BL 2
BL 3
BL 4
.743
.877
.784
.920
0,810
Brand Loyalty
BLT 1
BLT 2
BLT 3
.780
.865
.672
0,683
Perceived
Price Fairness
PPF 1
PPF 2
PPF 3
.734
.629
.847
0,772
1030 | The Role of Brand Anthropomorphism In Shaping Brand Love and Brand Loyalty To
European Car Consumers In Indonesia
According to (Hair Jr, 2010) states that one
of the ways that can be used to estimate the
validity of such convergent is based on the
value of the loading factor. The minimum
loading factor limit for each indicator item is
0.35-0.40 (Hair Jr, 2010). Before conducting a
factor analysis, there are requirements that
must be met, namely the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin
Measure of Sampling Adequacy (KMO MSA)
test and the Barlett's Test of Sphericity and
no cross-loading occurs. The required KMO
MSA value is above 0.5 and Barlett's Test of
Sphericity is statistically significant with a
significantly less than 0.05 (Hair Jr, 2010). The
KMO value in this study is 0.731, which
means KMO > 0.50. Based on these results,
the adequacy of the sample was declared to
be in the satisfactory category. Further
predictions and analysis of research variables
can also be continued. The hypothesis in this
study was tested using an influence test with
multiple linear regression analysis tools. The
results of the hypothesis test can be seen in
table 3.2.
Table 2. Model Test 1
In testing the accuracy of this research
model, statistically it can be seen that the
ability of independent variables, namely
Brand anthropomorphism and
brand
experiences, in predicting the variable love
for brands as a dependent variable shows
an adjusted R square of 0.428. This means
that the ability of independent variables as
predictors of dependent variables is 42.8
percent. The remaining 57.2 percent can be
influenced by other variables outside of this
research model.
The ability of this model to explain the
situation of reality is shown by the
Goodness of fit index which in this study is
shown with a value of F. With a value of F of
47.153 (> 1) and a significance of 0.000
(>0.05) shows that this model is able to
reflect the real state of affairs in reality.
Based on the results of hypothesis tests
that have been carried out, it can be seen
that brand anthrophomorphism has a
positive effect on brand love (β:0.328;
sig.:0.024). Thus, hypothesis 1 in this study
is supported
.
The results of this hypothesis
test are in accordance with the findings of
Singh (2021) which states that consumers
will love the brand as much as their attitude
in loving their fellow human beings if they
have got an emotional match.
Brand Experiences also have a positive
effect on
brand love
(β:0.310; sig.:0,000).
Thus, hypothesis 2 in this study is
supported
.
these findings confirm the
Independent
Variables
R
2
Adjusted
R
2
Dependent Variables :
Brand Love
B
t
Itself.
Brand
anthropomorphis
m
0,437
0,428
0,328
5,032
0,024
Brand Experience
0,370
4,740
0,017
Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1031
results of the research of (Safeer et al.,
2020) and the results of the research of
Joshi and Garg (2020) that the brand
experience can form a love for the brand.
The second model in this study is to answer
the third hypothesis. That is the influence of
brand love on
brand engagement
. The
results of the third hypothesis test can be
seen in the following table:
Table 3. Model 2 Test
Based on the results of the third
hypothesis test that has been carried out, it
can be seen that brand love has a positive
effect on brand engagement (β:0.375;
sig.:0.007). Thus, hypothesis 3 in this study
is supported
.
These findings confirm research from
(Wallace et al., 2014) and (Loureiro et al.,
2017) which state that love of a brand can
build the chemistry between the consumer
and the brand.
Based on the results of the fourth
hypothesis test which aims to test the
moderation effect of perceived price
fairness on the relationship between brand
love and brand engagement, it can be seen
that the perceived price fairness variable
does not moderate the relationship
between brand love and brand
engagement. The results of moderation
testing using hierarchical moderated
regression can be seen in the following
table:
Table 4. Moderation test results
Independent
Variables
R
2
Adjusted
R
2
F
Dependent Variables :
brand engagement
B
t
Itself.
Brand love
0,413
0,402
46,204
(0,000)
0,375
7,236
0,007
Stages
Regression
Variable
Independent/
Pemoderasi
Dependent Variables : Brand Engagement
Adjusted
D R²
F
ΔF
B
t
itself
1
BL
0,183
-
45,063
(0,000)
-
0,412
6,647
0,000
2
BL
0,174
-
0,009
34,733
(0,000)
-
10,330
0,408
6,530
0,000
PPF
0,039
0,562
0,575
3
BL
0,168
-
0,006
30,946
(0,000)
-3,787
0,616
2,204
0,029
PPF
0,267
0,872
0,384
BL*PPF
-
0,067
-
0,764
0,446
1032 | The Role of Brand Anthropomorphism In Shaping Brand Love and Brand Loyalty To
European Car Consumers In Indonesia
From table 4. it can be seen that perceived
price fairness does not moderate the
relationship between brand love and brand
engagement. Allegedly because at this
stage European car consumers no longer
see price as a significant problem. Apart
from the profile of its users, the majority of
whom are already at a high net worth level,
the love of the brand makes them not
hesitate to spend more funds for the
maintenance of the car.
CONCLUSIONS
This study aims to test the influence
of testing the influence of brand
anthropomorphism and brand experience
on brand love and its impact on brand
loyalty with perceived price fairness as a
moderation variable. Data analysis was
performed in three stages of regression
consisting of multiple linear regression to
test model 1, simple regression to test
model 2, and hierarchical moderated
regression to test the model. The third is
the moderation test. The results of the
study can be concluded as follows:
1. Brand anthropomorphism has a positive
effect on the formation of brand love. The
results of this hypothesis test support the
findings of research from Singh (2021)
which states that consumers will love
brands as much as their attitude in loving
their fellow human beings if they have
obtained an emotional fit.
2. Brand experience also has a positive and
significant effect on brand love. these
findings confirm the results of the research
of (Safeer et al., 2020) and the results of the
research of Joshi and Garg (2020) that the
brand experience can form a love for the
brand.
3. Brand love has a positive effect on brand
engagement. The results of this study
confirm research from (Wallace et al., 2014)
and (Loureiro et al., 2017) which states that
love for a brand can build consumer and
brand chemistry.
4. Perceived price fairness does not
moderate the relationship between brand
love and brand engagement. This is
because European car consumers no longer
see price as a significant problem. Apart
from the fact that the profiles of its users,
the majority of which are already at a high
net worth level, the love of the brand makes
them not hesitate to spend more funds on
the maintenance of the car.
REFERENCES
Aaker, J., Fournier, S., & Brasel, S. A. (2004).
When good brands do bad.
Journal of
Consumer Research
,
31
(1), 116.
Aaker, J. L. (1999). The malleable self: The
role of self-expression in persuasion.
Journal of Marketing Research
,
36
(1),
4557.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2007). Is that
car smiling at me? Schema congruity
as a basis for evaluating
anthropomorphized products.
Journal
of Consumer Research
,
34
(4), 468479.
Aggarwal, P., & McGill, A. L. (2012). When
brands seem human, do humans act
like brands? Automatic behavioral
Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1033
priming effects of brand
anthropomorphism.
Journal of
Consumer Research
,
39
(2), 307323.
Batra, R., Ahuvia, A., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2012).
Brand love.
Journal of Marketing
,
76
(2), 116.
Belk, R. W. (1988). Possessions and the
extended self.
Journal of Consumer
Research
,
15
(2), 139168.
Carroll, B. A., & Ahuvia, A. C. (2006). Some
antecedents and outcomes of brand
love.
Marketing Letters
,
17
, 7989.
Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2010). Use does
not wear ragged the fabric of
friendship: Thinking of objects as alive
makes people less willing to replace
them.
Journal of Consumer
Psychology
,
20
(2), 138145.
Chartrand, T. L., Fitzsimons, G. M., &
Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic
effects of anthropomorphized objects
on behavior.
Social Cognition
,
26
(2),
198209.
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2008).
The chain of effects from brand trust
and brand affect to brand
performance.
Journal of Marketing
,
65
(3), 8.
Cooper, D. , & P. S. (2011).
Business Research
Method
(Ninth edition). McGraw-Hill
Education.
Drennan, J., Bianchi, C., Cacho-Elizondo, S.,
Louriero, S., Guibert, N., & Proud, W.
(2015). Examining the role of wine
brand love on brand loyalty: A multi-
country comparison.
International
Journal of Hospitality Management
,
49
, 4755.
Escalas, J. E., & Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-
construal, reference groups, and
brand meaning.
Journal of Consumer
Research
,
32
(3), 378389.
Fitzsimons, G. M., Chartrand, T. L., &
Fitzsimons, G. J. (2008). Automatic
effects of brand exposure on
motivated behavior: How apple makes
you “think different.
Journal of
Consumer Research
,
35
(1), 2135.
Fournier, S. (1998). Consumers and their
brands: Developing relationship
theory in consumer research.
Journal
of Consumer Research
,
24
(4), 343373.
Fournier, S., & Alvarez, C. (2012). Brands as
relationship partners: Warmth,
competence, and in-between.
Journal
of Consumer Psychology
,
22
(2), 177
185.
Guthrie, S. E. (1995).
Faces in the clouds: A
new theory of religion
. Oxford
University Press.
Hair Jr, J. F. , W. C. B. B. J. B. R. E. A. D. A.
(2010).
Multivariate Data Analysis
(7th
Edition). Prentice hall.
Landwehr, J. R., McGill, A. L., & Herrmann, A.
(2011). It’s got the look: The effect of
friendly and aggressive “facial”
expressions on product liking and
sales.
Journal of Marketing
,
75
(3), 132
146.
Loureiro, S. M. C., Gorgus, T., & Kaufmann,
H. R. (2017). Antecedents and
outcomes of online brand
engagement: The role of brand love
on enhancing electronic-word-of-
mouth.
Online Information Review
,
41
(7), 9851005.
MacInnis, D. J. (2012). “Brands as intentional
agents”: Questions and extensions.
Journal of Consumer Psychology
,
22
(2), 195198.
MartínConsuegra, D., Molina, A., &
Esteban, A. (2007). An integrated
1034 | The Role of Brand Anthropomorphism In Shaping Brand Love and Brand Loyalty To
European Car Consumers In Indonesia
model of price, satisfaction and
loyalty: an empirical analysis in the
service sector.
Journal of Product &
Brand Management
,
16
(7), 459468.
Matzler, K., Renzl, B., & Faullant, R. (2007).
Dimensions of price satisfaction: a
replication and extension.
International Journal of Bank
Marketing
,
25
(6), 394405.
Palusuk, N., Koles, B., & Hasan, R. (2019). All
you need is brand love’: a critical
review and comprehensive conceptual
framework for brand love.
Journal of
Marketing Management
,
35
(12), 97
129.
Puzakova, M., Kwak, H., & Rocereto, J.
(2009). Pushing the envelope of brand
and personality: Antecedents and
moderators of anthropomorphized
brands.
ACR North American
Advances
.
Rijsdijk, S. A., Hultink, E. J., &
Diamantopoulos, A. (2007). Product
intelligence: its conceptualization,
measurement and impact on
consumer satisfaction.
Journal of the
Academy of Marketing Science
,
35
,
340356.
Safeer, A. A., He, Y., & Abrar, M. (2020). The
influence of brand experience on
brand authenticity and brand love: an
empirical study from Asian consumers’
perspective.
Asia Pacific Journal of
Marketing and Logistics
,
33
(5), 1123
1138.
Sarkar, A., Sarkar, J. G., & Bhatt, G. (2019).
Store love in single brand retailing: the
roles of relevant moderators.
Marketing Intelligence & Planning
,
37
(2), 168181.
Sarkar, A., & Sreejesh, S. (2014).
Examination of the roles played by
brand love and jealousy in shaping
customer engagement.
Journal of
Product & Brand Management
.
Siew, S.-W., Minor, M. S., & Felix, R. (2018).
The influence of perceived strength of
brand origin on willingness to pay
more for luxury goods.
Journal of
Brand Management
,
25
, 591605.
Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer
behavior: A critical review.
Journal of
Consumer Research
,
9
(3), 287300.
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory
of creativity.
Psychology of Aesthetics,
Creativity, and the Arts
,
12
(1), 50.
Wallace, E., Buil, I., & de Chernatony, L.
(2014). Consumer engagement with
self-expressive brands: brand love and
WOM outcomes.
Journal of Product &
Brand Management
.
Wang, Y.-C., Qu, H., & Yang, J. (2019). The
formation of sub-brand love and
corporate brand love in hotel brand
portfolios.
International Journal of
Hospitality Management
,
77
, 375384.
Windhager, S., Slice, D. E., Schaefer, K.,
Oberzaucher, E., Thorstensen, T., &
Grammer, K. (2008). Face to face: The
perception of automotive designs.
Human Nature
,
19
, 331346.
Yazid, A. S., Mkheimer, I., & Mahmud, M. S.
(2020). The effect of corporate image
on customer loyalty: The mediating
effect of customer satisfaction.
Journal
of Research on the Lepidoptera
,
51
(2),
124138.
© 2023 by the authors. Submitted
for possible open access publication
under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/)