Pramatatya Resindra Widya, Adi Mursalin | 1025
consumers build relationships with brands
similar to interpersonal brands (Fournier,
1998); (Fournier & Alvarez, 2012), whether
and to what extent consumers view brands
as 'intelligent agents' (Rijsdijk et al., 2007),
or 'deliberate agents' (Kervyn et al,2012), as
well as how consumers experience
emotions towards brands that are usually
felt by humans, such as love (Batra et al.,
2012), passion and forgiveness (MacInnis,
2012). In academic research, the tendency
of consumers to anthropomorphization of
branded products has recently attracted
the attention of scholars. Previous studies
have examined the psychological processes
that are activated when consumers are
faced with products with a human-like
appearance (Aggarwal & McGill, 2007), and
their consequences on product evaluation
(Landwehr et al., 2011) and purchasing
behavior (Chandler & Schwarz, 2010)
(Aggarwal & McGill, 2012). In other streams
of research, research has investigated how
consumers build relationships with brands
similar to interpersonal brands (Fournier,
1998); (Fournier & Alvarez, 2012), whether
and to what extent consumers view brands
as 'intelligent agents' (Rijsdijk et al., 2007),
or 'deliberate agents' (Kervyn et al,2012), as
well as how consumers experience
emotions towards brands that are usually
felt by humans, such as love (Batra et al.,
2012), passion and forgiveness (MacInnis,
2012). In conclusion, brand
anthropomorphism, that is, the extent to
which branded products are considered
human (Epley et al, 2007; (Aggarwal &
McGill, 2012), are gaining a superior
position in branding research. However,
despite its growing relevance in research
and practice, little is known about the
conceptual domain of this relatively recent
construction and its measurements.
Previous studies (e.g., (Aggarwal & McGill,
2007); Kim and McGill, 2011) have
examined this concept in an experimental
setting, manipulating rather than
measuring the degree of brand
anthropomorphism, and some of the
available scales are only used for
manipulation examination without being
empirically validated. This research fills this
important gap by developing a scale of
measurement of brand anthropomorphism,
which can be useful for researchers and
practitioners to ask how branded products
can be anthropomorphized, and whether
this phenomenon has an impact on
consumers' perception and evaluation of
these products. Anthropomorphism refers
to an individual's tendency to see inanimate
objects as human-like entities (Guthrie,
1995). Epley et al (2007) describes this
phenomenon as a process of inference that
connects external characteristics,
motivations, behaviors, and basic states
typical of humans with non-human objects
and agents. Psychological research has
extensively shown how people tend to
anthropomorphize objects such as
personal computers (Waytzdkk,2010) and
cars (Windhager et al., 2008), as well as
non-human agents such as supernatural
entities (Epley et al,2008a) and pets
(Chartrand et al., 2008). Such a trend seems
so widespread that it has recently caught
the attention of marketing experts (e.g.,
Kim and McGill, 2011; (Aggarwal & McGill,
2012), who investigated
anthropomorphism with respect to
branded products. The concept of brand
anthropomorphism here is defined as the