1590 | The Effect of COVID-19, KUR and Communication on the Productivity of MSME
Entrepreneurs Partners PT Perkebunan Nusantara III Medan City
the t-count is 2.287 and the t-table
is 2.012. The test results show t
count > t table (2.287 > 2.012).
Judging from its significance, the
significant value of the Kur
variable is 0.027, smaller than the
significant value of 0.10.
c. The amount of t-count for variable
is 2.348 with a significant value of
0.023, so it can be concluded that
the t-count is 2.348 and the t-table
is 2.012. The test results show t
count > t table (2.238 > 2.012).
Judging from the significance, the
significant value of the
Communication variable is 0.023,
smaller than the significant value
of 0.10.
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the results of the research and
discussion described in the previous
chapter, the following conclusions can be
drawn: 1) Partially, the COVID-19 variable
(X1) has a positive and significant effect on
the productivity (Y) of Partner SMEs PT.
Nusantara III Plantation, Medan. 2) Partially,
the Kur variable (X2) has a positive and
significant effect on the productivity (Y) of
MSMEs fostered by PT. Nusantara III
Plantation, Medan. 3) Partially, the
Communication variable (X3) has a positive
and significant effect on the productivity (Y)
of MSMEs fostered by PT. Nusantara III
Plantation, Medan. 4) Simultaneously, the
variables COVID-19 (X1), Kur (X2) and
Communication (X3) have a positive and
significant effect on the productivity (Y) of
MSMEs fostered by PT. Nusantara III
Plantation, Medan.
REFERENCES
Chiaramonti, D., Prussi, M., Ferrero, S.,
Oriani, L., Ottonello, P., Torre, P., &
Cherchi, F. (2012). Review of
pretreatment processes for
lignocellulosic ethanol production, and
development of an innovative method.
Biomass and Bioenergy, 4(6), 25–35.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.201
2.04.020
Consoli, D. (2012). Literature analysis on
determinant factors and the impact of
ICT in SMEs. Procedia-Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 6(2), 93–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.0
9.016
Depan, B., Tandon, P., & Umum, F. (2011).
Metode Penelitian Pendidikan:
pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R
& D.
Hidayat, B., Putri, A. S., Ophiyandri, T.,
Istijono, B., Amaratunga, D., Haigh, R., &
de Silva, A. (2021). Analysis of the
government regulations on COVID-19
pandemics in Indonesia:
implementation and challenges. E3S
Web of Conferences, 3, 1016.
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20213
3101016
Khaldi, K. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative or
mixed research: Which research
paradigm to use? Journal of Educational
and Social Research, 7(2), 1–15.
10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15
Rahmanti, A. R., Ningrum, D. N. A., Lazuardi,
L., Yang, H.-C., & Li, Y.-C. J. (2021). Social
media data analytics for outbreak risk
communication: public attention on the
“New Normal” during the COVID-19
pandemic in Indonesia. Computer
Methods and Programs in Biomedicine,