JRSSEM 2022, Vol. 01, No. 11, 1963 – 1973
E-ISSN: 2807 - 6311, P-ISSN: 2807 - 6494
DOI : 10.36418/jrssem.v1i11.131 https://jrssem.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jrssem/index
EVALUATION OF FACULTY READINESS IN REALIZING
ENTREPRENEURIAL UNIVERSITY AGENDA
Virna Vidya Yustita
1*
Astri Ghina
2
1,2
Telkom University, Bandung, Indonesia
e-mail: virnavidya[email protected]
1
, astrighina@telkomuniversity.ac.id
2
*Correspondence: virnavidya13@gmail.com
Submitted: 27 May 2022, Revised: 06 June 2022, Accepted: 15 June 2022
Abstract. Knowledge and changes in the higher education sector are currently contributing to
socio-economic developments that encourage new forms of cooperation and the economy related
to the process of globalization, social dynamics, and the development of a knowledge-based
economy. Entrepreneurship in higher education is a fairly new concept. EU in the sense of three
things: the university itself, the members of the university (faculty) and the interaction of the
university with the environment. The selection of the object is based on the fact that FEB has quite
a lot of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) during 2016-2019. In this study, it aims to realize the
economic and business framework of Telkom University in realizing the entrepreneurial university
agenda, it must implement the EU dimension itself, there are 8 dimensions to realize the EU
architecturally. This study uses a qualitative method with interview sources, namely FEB lecturers
who have high positions such as deans, vice deans, and lecturers related to entrepreneurship. The
results of this study prove that the Faculty of Economics and Business has many programs created
by both of them but will support this EU activity, many dimensions need to be improved both from
the website and information between students, lecturers and staff. Researchers provide various
kinds of practical suggestions that architecture can do in improving and developing programs to
support Entrepreneurial University activities.
Keywords: entrepreneurial university; entreprenership; entrepreneur.
Virna Vidya Yustita, Astri Ghina
| 1964
DOI : 10.36418/jrssem.v1i11.131 https://jrssem.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jrssem/index
INTRODUCTION
Entrepreneurial university in higher
education is a fairly new concept (Klofsten
et al., 2019). This is a pressure for
universities to make preparations in
adapting within the scope of society and
the economy (Succi & Canovi, 2020). One
way to realize the EU agenda is to make
graduates from these faculties become
entrepreneurs (Akhmetshin et al., 2019). To
start a business or become an entrepreneur
requires many stages to support the
ongoing business (Ratten, 2020), especially
in the survival and development of the
business The following are the stages
needed in the development of a start-up
according to (Cardoni et al., 2018) by
calculating the average experience by
(Ajide, 2020) in The IDIA (2017).
These stages of course require
assistance through the learning process
from various institutions (G‘ayratovich,
2022). So the researchers selected objects
at Telkom University with the object
selection criteria (Djamaluddin et al.,
2022)Strata-1, has an entrepreneurial
expertise group, has a vision/mission to
develop entrepreneurial aspects (Zakariah,
2022). The following is the object selection
process at Telkom University.
Table 1. Business Development
Criteria
Reason
Study Object Selection
Undergraduate
Based on the startup life cycle, a
minimum of 4 years is required
(Rebel, 2017; The IDIA, 2017) to
create a startup that starts from idea
creation to validation
business model (early stage).
FTE, FRI, FIF, FEB, FKB, FIK
Have an
Entrepreneurship
Expertise Group
Entrepreneurship is a support system
that is assumed to be able to
integrate entrepreneurship
programs into teaching, research,
and community service activities at
the faculty
the.
FRI, FEB, FKB
Have a vision/mission to
develop entrepreneurial
aspects
To realize the Entrepreneurial
University (EU) agenda, each faculty
will have an integrated
entrepreneurship program and this
should be reflected in the following:
faculty vision/mission.
FEB, FKB
1965 | Evaluation of Faculty Readiness in Realizing Entrepreneurial University Agenda
DOI : 10.36418/jrssem.v1i11.131 https://jrssem.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jrssem/index
There are 2 study objects that will be
explored regarding their role in realizing
the EU agenda (Klerkx et al., 2019) namely
FEB and FKB with the following
considerations:
a. Both have decreased the percentage of
entrepreneurs in the 2016-2018 period.
b. In 2019 both experienced an increase in
the percentage of the number of
entrepreneurs but the amount was not
significant (Presutti & Odorici, 2019).
c. The average percentage of the number
of entrepreneurs of the two faculties is
still below the ideal number when
compared to that conveyed by the
Chancellor of Ciputra University (UC)
for the 2017-2021 period (Riviezzo et
al., 2019). Ir. Yohannes Sowawihardja,
M.Sc., 30% of graduates have a
business that was started during their
studies (Radar Surabaya, 24 March
2017). Ciputra University is assumed to
be a university that is used as a
benchmark for the implementation of
an ideal Entrepreneurial University for
implementation in Indonesia (Wijaya &
Radianto, 2016) in accordance with
what is stated in the vision, mission, and
values of Ciputra University
(Kapitulčinová et al., 2018).
This study focuses on FEB because FEB
has more registered Intellectual Property
Rights (HKI) than FKB but the average
number of FEB entrepreneurs during 2016-
2019 is lower than FKB. If viewed from the
EU theory, HKI is a source of knowledge
that can be commercialized into a startup
that can be run by lecturers and students.
Ideally, if the number of IPRs is higher, the
number of entrepreneurs will also be
higher. This condition shows that there is a
discrepancy in the activities of the
tridharma that should be integrated with
each other, many of the potential IPRs
owned by FEB are not explored to be
commercialized into startups. The EU
agenda at Telkom University must be
achieved by 2023, meaning that faculties
still have about 2 years to make
adjustments to the management of their
entrepreneurship program so that the EU
agenda at Telkom University can be
achieved effectively.
METHODS
This type of research is a qualitative
descriptive survey. The results of this survey
descriptively explain the respondents'
views on this topic. Population and sample
of this research. The stages start from
determining the phenomenon by
formulating problems and formulating a
framework of thought, then proceed with
interviewing FEB lecturers who have high
positions such as the Dean, Deputy Dean 1,
Deputy Dean 2, Secretary of the MBTI
Study Program and MBTI Lecturers.
Sources of data in research are defined as
people, objects or objects that can provide
information, facts, data, and facts related to
what is being studied or studied. Sources
of data in research can be classified into 2,
namely primary data sources and
secondary data. The sampling process is
carried out using the Triangulation
technique with a lever process that
combines several points of view and
methods. In social science, it refers to the
combination of two or more theories, data
sources, methods, or investigators in
Virna Vidya Yustita, Astri Ghina
| 1966
studying a phenomenon to form a single
construction. Triangulation can be used in
both qualitative and quantitative research.
The process of data collection was carried
out by collecting and in-depth interviews
from various sources. The survey method
consisted of a questionnaire with closed
questions and a detailed interview sheet. In
data analysis, Miles and Huberman's theory
is used in the analysis phase. 1) Data
collection. 2) Data reduction. 3) Data
presentation 4) Miles and Huberman
findings and validation.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The discussion related to Leadership
and Governance, which has been prepared
by the Faculty, is a curriculum that refers to
the realm of entrepreneurship and provides
programs to create start-ups. Then the
faculty has provided facilities and budgets
to support entrepreneurship activities.
Then in carrying out the discussion related
to leadership and governance, there is a
challenge that is faced is the lack of
publicity related to implementations
related to entrepreneurship. So that many
do not understand and understand related
to these implementations (Dare et al.,
2018); (Rose & Grant, 2010).
Digital Transformation and Capabilities,
which have been carried out by the study
program, have begun to focus on providing
information and products based on the
internet and courses that can be integrated
into the Tri Dharma of Higher Education.
Then the existing infrastructure is an LMS.
The challenge faced is that there is no
requirement for students to produce EC-
OECD business (2012).
Organizational Capacity, Society and
Incentives, the discussion aims to provide
improvement and support for
entrepreneurial spirit, the faculty has
prepared funding and implementation
such as GRID and giving each prize. Then
the challenge faced is the gap between the
academic community where staff or faculty
staff are not included in the EC-OECD
faculty program (2012).
Entrepreneurship Development in the
Learning Process, which have been carried
out by the Faculty, provide facilities for
lecturers to develop entrepreneurial skills
including Cooperation with external
groups. The faculty has also provided
courses to provide support for
entrepreneurship strategies. Then the
challenge encountered is that information
regarding the faculty obtained by the
lecturer has not been disclosed. Some
courses are not found on the campus'
official website, so prospective students do
not know about it.
Entrepreneur Preparation and Support,
which have been carried out by HIMA and
BEM, are developing entrepreneurial
teachings with courses that create start-ups
or students who study independently. Then
providing growth in interest in
entrepreneurship is also carried out by
holding seminars and public lectures that
bring in successful entrepreneurs. Then the
challenge faced is to only focus on courses
and campus activities, there is no direct
practice to the audience of St-Jean and
Labelle 2018; EC-OECD 2012.
1967 | Evaluation of Faculty Readiness in Realizing Entrepreneurial University Agenda
Knowledge Exchange and
Collaboration, which have been carried out
by the Faculty, providing facilities for
workers and students to participate in
mentoring MSMEs. Cooperation with
external parties is carried out through
alumni and overseas students. And the
problem encountered is that there is no
definite policy regarding this activity due to
the presence of ideas from resource
persons, only available for students.
Global Institutions, the implementation
that has been carried out is the holding of
student exchange programs and joint
research from within and outside the
country. The problem faced is that it is not
evenly distributed because the faculty only
focuses on certain students.
Impact Measurement, which has been
carried out is an evaluation which is carried
out once every semester. However, the
obstacles encountered are that some
implementations have not been evaluated
because they require a long time and
incomplete data collection.
Virna Vidya Yustita, Astri Ghina
| 1968
DOI : 10.36418/jrssem.v1i11.131 https://jrssem.publikasiindonesia.id/index.php/jrssem/index
Table 2. Leadership and Governance
No
Entrepreneurial
University
Variables
Suitability of Literacy
Challenge
1
Leadership and
Governance
The faculty prepares a
curriculum that leads to
the field of
entrepreneurship and
provides programs to
create start-ups.
Infrastructure and
budget have been
provided by the faculty
to support
entrepreneurial
activities.
Lack of publicity
regarding these
programs.
2
Digital
Transformation and
Capability
Courses that begin to
focus on producing
digital-based
knowledge and
products and courses
that can be integrated
into the Tri Dharma of
Higher Education.
The existing digital
infrastructure is the
LMS.
There is no
obligation for
students to
generate
business.
3
Organisational
Capacity, People
and Incentives
To increase and support
the entrepreneurial
spirit, the faculty
prepares funds and
programs such as GRID
by providing their
respective rewards.
There is a gap
between the
academic
community
where staff or
faculty staff are
not included in
faculty activities
4
Entrepreneurship
Development in
Teaching and
Learning
The faculty facilitates
lecturers to develop
entrepreneurial skills
including collaboration
with external parties.
The faculty also
Information
about the
facilities received
by lecturers has
not been
disclosed.
1969 | Evaluation of Faculty Readiness in Realizing Entrepreneurial University Agenda
provides courses in
supporting
entrepreneurial
strategies.
Some courses
are not on the
campus' official
website, so
prospective
students will not
know about it.
5
Preparing and
Supporting
Entrepreneurs
Developing
entrepreneurial values
through courses that
produce start-ups or
students learning
independently through
HIMA and BEM.
Stimulating interest in
entrepreneurship is also
carried out through
seminars and public
lectures inviting
successful
entrepreneurs.
Focusing on
campus courses
and activities,
there is no direct
practice to the
community.
6
Knowledge
Exchange and
Collaboration
The faculty facilitates
employees and
students to be involved
in mentoring MSMEs.
Collaboration with
external parties is
carried out by alumni
and international
students.
There are no
definite
regulations
regarding these
activities due to
differences of
opinion from the
informants.
Only available for
certain circles of
students.
7
The Globalized
Institution
There are joint
exchange and research
programs from within
the country and abroad.
Not evenly
distributed
because the
faculty focus on
certain students
8
Measuring Impact
Evaluation is carried out
once a semester.
Some programs
have not been
evaluated
because it takes
Virna Vidya Yustita, Astri Ghina
| 1970
a long time and
incomplete data
CONCLUSIONS
The conclusion obtained from the
research that has been done is that the
Faculty improves the website and other
social media that provide information
about the courses that are obtained while
studying at the Faculty of Economics and
Business. Especially in courses in the field of
entrepreneurship, so that prospective
students and students know this
information and can generate student
interest in entrepreneurship. The faculty
has data on businesses or businesses
owned by students, and lecturers provide
information to students that businesses
and businesses owned can be a substitute
(credit exemption) for one of the courses in
entrepreneurship on the condition that the
business has been running for 2 years or
more and submit financial reports profit
and loss, then the lecturer conducts a
survey and evaluation of the business. For
students who do not have a business, they
are required to create a new product or
business based on community problems.
This program starts from researching the
location where the problem will be solved,
then students are required to solve the
problem at that location by creating a new
product or business. Lecturers make a 1
semester 1 time fee plan for
entrepreneurial activities which include;
seminars, inviting guest lecturers, inviting
successful entrepreneurs, bazaars, and
others. The faculty provides rewards for
lecturers, staff, and students in the form of
announcement of nominations in the field
of entrepreneurship, for example; best
selling product, best business plan, or
enthusiastic entrepreneurial spirit. This
program can be done every 3 months and
pasted on the announcement board along
with the winner's photo. Nominations are
voted on by lecturers and staff and then
voted on by students. The faculty holds
meetings for lecturers and staff at the
beginning of each semester and provides
information about the facilities provided,
namely seminars and off-campus training.
The faculty provides announcements
through the website or other social media
regarding the facilities received by students
such as; incubator, selection of grant funds
for student businesses, exchanges, and
other entrepreneurial hub programs. Due
to the fact that most of the information is
still difficult to obtain, the faculty acts as an
intermediary between the university and
students regarding this information.
Lecturers evaluate courses in the field of
entrepreneurship and evaluate student
businesses that are recorded. This activity is
carried out at least 1 semester 2 times.
REFERENCES
Ajide, F. M. (2020). Infrastructure and
entrepreneurship: Evidence from Africa.
Journal of Developmental
Entrepreneurship, 5(3), 205–215.
https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRC-09-2021-
0079
1971 | Evaluation of Faculty Readiness in Realizing Entrepreneurial University Agenda
Akhmetshin, E. M., Mueller, J. E., Chikunov,
S. O., Fedchenko, E. A., & Pronskaya, O.
N. (2019). Innovative technologies in
entrepreneurship education: the case of
European and Asian countries. Journal
of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(10), 1–
15.
Cardoni, A., Dumay, J., Palmaccio, M., &
Celenza, D. (2018). Knowledge transfer
in a start-up craft brewery. In Business
Process Management Journal. Emerald
Publishing Limited.
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H.
(2018). Understanding science teachers’
implementations of integrated STEM
curricular units through a
phenomenological multiple case study.
International Journal of STEM Education,
5(1), 1–19.
Djamaluddin, R., Priyadi, Y., & Darwiyanto,
E. (2022). User-Centered Design to
Improve Personal Development In
Comic Application. 2022 IEEE 12th
Annual Computing and Communication
Workshop and Conference (CCWC),
966–973.
Ehrenhard, M., Wijnhoven, F., van den
Broek, T., & Stagno, M. Z. (2017).
Unlocking how start-ups create
business value with mobile
applications: Development of an App-
enabled Business Innovation Cycle.
Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 5(11), 26–36.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.techfore.2016.09.011
G‘ayratovich, E. N. (2022). It Is A Modern
Educational Model Based On The
Integration Of Knowledge. Eurasian
Scientific Herald, 5(2), 22–55.
Galvão, A. R., Mascarenhas, C., Marques, C.
S. E., Braga, V., & Ferreira, M. (2020).
Mentoring entrepreneurship in a rural
territory–A qualitative exploration of an
entrepreneurship program for rural
areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 7(8),
314–324.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.jrurstud.2020.06.038
Kapitulčinová, D., AtKisson, A., Perdue, J., &
Will, M. (2018). Towards integrated
sustainability in higher education–
Mapping the use of the Accelerator
toolset in all dimensions of university
practice. Journal of Cleaner Production,
7(10), 4367–4382.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.0
5.050
Khan, M. H. (2019). Knowledge, skills and
organizational capabilities for structural
transformation. Structural Change and
Economic Dynamics, 4(8), 42–52.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.strueco.2018.05.006
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019). A
review of social science on digital
agriculture, smart farming and
agriculture 4.0: New contributions and
a future research agenda. NJAS-
Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences,
9(2), 1003-1015.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2019.100
315
Klofsten, M., Fayolle, A., Guerrero, M., Mian,
S., Urbano, D., & Wright, M. (2019). The
entrepreneurial university as driver for
economic growth and social change-
Key strategic challenges. Technological
Forecasting and Social Change, 4(11),
149–158.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.techfore.2018.12.004
Virna Vidya Yustita, Astri Ghina
| 1972
Lukeš, M., Longo, M. C., & Zouhar, J. (2019).
Do business incubators really enhance
entrepreneurial growth? Evidence from
a large sample of innovative Italian
start-ups. Technovation, 8(2), 25–34.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.technovation.2018.07.008
Marra, A., Carlei, V., & Baldassari, C. (2020).
Exploring networks of proximity for
partner selection, firms’ collaboration
and knowledge exchange. The case of
clean-tech industry. Business Strategy
and the Environment, 2(3), 1034–1044.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002
/bse.2415
Nasreen, S., Mahalik, M. K., Shahbaz, M., &
Abbas, Q. (2020). How do financial
globalization, institutions and
economic growth impact financial
sector development in European
countries? Research in International
Business and Finance, 5(4), 101–120.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.ribaf.2020.101247
Presutti, M., & Odorici, V. (2019). Linking
entrepreneurial and market orientation
to the SME’s performance growth: the
moderating role of entrepreneurial
experience and networks. International
Entrepreneurship and Management
Journal, 5(3), 697–720.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-
0533-4
Ratten, V. (2020). Coronavirus and
international business: An
entrepreneurial ecosystem perspective.
Thunderbird International Business
Review, 6(5), 629–634.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22161
Riviezzo, A., Santos, S. C., Liñán, F.,
Napolitano, M. R., & Fusco, F. (2019).
European universities seeking
entrepreneurial paths: the moderating
effect of contextual variables on the
entrepreneurial orientation-
performance relationship.
Technological Forecasting and Social
Change, 4(11), 232–248.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018
.10.011
Rose, W. R., & Grant, G. G. (2010). Critical
issues pertaining to the planning and
implementation of E-Government
initiatives. Government Information
Quarterly, 2(7), 26–33.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.giq.2009.06.002
Schoonenboom, J. (2014). Using an
adapted, task-level technology
acceptance model to explain why
instructors in higher education intend
to use some learning management
system tools more than others.
Computers & Education, 7(2), 247–256.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.compedu.2013.09.016
Setyawati, C. Y. (2016). Dampak Mentoring
Pada Keberhasilan Start-Up Business:
Studi Kasus Pada Start-Up Business di
Indonesia [Mentoring the Impact of
Success of a Start-Up Business: A Case
Study of a Start-Up Business in
Indonesia]. DeReMa (Development
Research of Management): Jurnal
Manajemen, 2(11), 290–310.
Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to
enhance graduate employability:
comparing students and employers’
perceptions. Studies in Higher
Education, 4(9), 1834–1847.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.201
9.1585420
Wardana, L. W., Narmaditya, B. S., Wibowo,
1973 | Evaluation of Faculty Readiness in Realizing Entrepreneurial University Agenda
A., Mahendra, A. M., Wibowo, N. A.,
Harwida, G., & Rohman, A. N. (2020).
The impact of entrepreneurship
education and students’
entrepreneurial mindset: the mediating
role of attitude and self-efficacy.
Heliyon, 6(9), e04922.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016
/j.heliyon.2020.e04922
Wijaya, O. Y. A., & Radianto, W. E. D. (2016).
Mentoring dan coaching sebagai
strategi pengembangan pendidikan
kewirausahaan: studi fenomenologi.
Zakariah, M. A. (2022). Leadership of the
Regional Director of Kolaka Enterprises
Company (PERUSDA Kolaka). Jurnal
Teknologi Pendidikan Madrasah, 5(1),
8–17.
© 2022 by the authors. Submitted
for possible open access publication
under the terms and conditions of the Creative
Commons Attribution (CC BY SA) license
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/).